This last part pulls back the cover from the “big picture” that COVID fits into, and why there has been such an unrelenting push for everyone in the world to get vaccinated. It also addresses some of the most controversial issues about what is actually in the COVID shots, whether or not these shots can change DNA, reports of undisclosed substances in the vaccines, and whether there are other non-health purposes these shots may be serving. That brings us to the third reason why many in the medical community have not been told this information before.
This Part 3 provides an overview of several issues relating to the effectiveness of the COVID vaccines. It discusses ways in which the data and definitions have been manipulated to misrepresent and hide the vaccines’ true effectiveness. It addresses the high number of breakthrough cases, a comparison of natural vs. vaccine immunity, and risk/benefit analyses. It also briefly addresses the issue of whether the vaccines are causing the variants, and reports from other sources showing serious adverse impacts, including autopsy and embalmers’ findings, and unprecedented increases in life insurance and disability claims.
In Part 2 we present more extensive data, expert analyses and other information showing that the COVID vaccines are not only not safe and effective, but are actually dangerous and potentially extremely harmful, as the alleged “misinformation spreaders” have been warning about. We also summarize and provide information about the mechanisms of injury caused by the shots; a comparison with the response to adverse reactions to the 1976 Swine flu vaccine; and the effects of the vaccines on pregnant women, the military, and those over 65.
This series presents an overview of evidence on several key issues involved in the “safe and effective” debate. Part 1 sets up the controversy, and presents clear evidence that the COVID shots are not true “vaccines,” and that a vaccine was not even necessary in the first place. It also raises issues about whether the requirements of Emergency Use Authorization were met.
An effective protocol for COVID-19 treatment was started at an internal medicine clinic in Gulf Breeze, FL and began with a local group of physicians using best practices from review of all the literature including the Sars CoV-1 at the turn of this century.
In this third part we examine the path not taken: a handful of cheap, widely available, home-based therapies—ozone preconditioning, hydroxychloroquine, and light/vitamin treatment—which, had they been implemented early in the pandemic could have reduced morbidity and mortality by 80% or more. We estimate these interventions could have prevented about 4.8 million deaths globally and 768,000 in the US and in the process put an early end to the pandemic.
The purpose of this study is to report on the unprecedented rise in decidual cast shedding (DCS) that occurred in 2021. DCS is historically a rare gynecological event, with less than 40 cases reported in the medical literature over the last 109 years. Previous journal articles on DCS were usually case studies; population prevalence data is non-existent.
In the second part of our trilogy, we begin by examining social policies sponsored by the science community and enacted by policy-makers to curtail the dynamics of the COVID-19 pandemic. Containment /mitigation strategies such as lockdowns came at great social and economic costs and yet failed to meaningfully impact the spread and evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
Two years into the pandemic, with the number of deaths over five million globally and vaccine-resistant variants continuing to multiply, scientists are in the midst of the most dangerous and ill-conceived experiment in the history of medicine.
Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices (KAP) surveys precede an awareness or intervention program, it addresses a felt need in a population in which that need exists.
Covid-19 pandemic has hit many countries and put the majority of the public health system to test globally. Mandatory use of facemask was among policies set by the government to contain the spread of the novel disease. But citizens’ attitudes and compliance with these policies are important in controlling the pandemic.
We appreciate the attention and interest in our manuscript. The letter raises a handful of issues that pertain not simply to our description of the previously unrecognized phenomenon of magnetic attraction/attachment but regarding the scientific method itself and the generation of new scientific knowledge.
I was fascinated by the study by Thorp et al. on the magnetic effects of Covid-19 vaccination – or rather the lack of the same . The paper’s title is in no way supported by the data. A static magnetic field is a force. The investigators did not do any tests for energy, and even their tests for magnetism were seriously flawed.
In recent months unexpected reports have surfaced claiming the presence of magnetic attraction in the shoulder regions of subjects who had recently received the COVID-19 vaccination. To determine if such claims are legitimate or spurious, a prospective observational study was performed utilizing standard neodymium magnets and non-magnetized paper clips in a rigorously standardized application protocol.
The aim of this study was to assess, identify and have a better understanding of the importance of patient safety culture within the healthcare organization and to create insights on the impact of cultural management systems regarding patient safety.
The pandemic scenario created by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome – Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) brought physical and psychological distress among people who found themselves under a situation which unabled most of them to proceed with their usual routine or rites of passing to cope with losses of lifestyle, relatives, and friends.
The Department of Public Health publishes Open Access peer-reviewed papers focusing on international public health issues. The Department intends to enhance knowledge on the social and individual factors determining the basic conditions of public health, analyzing causal interrelations, and offering a scientifically sound rationale for personal, social and political measures of intervention.
The Department of Public Health has a special focus on the environmental, behavioral, and occupational aspects of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community. The following subject areas are covered in this specialty however the accepted papers are not constrained only to the listed areas.
Please direct any enquiry or submit papers to: email@example.com